This project looks at the effects of economic change on interethnic and other social relations in two different field settings in Uzbekistan, one in the Bukhara Oasis and one in the Ferghana Valley. On a line indicating the expected likelihood of conflict, the two represent opposing poles: Bukhara as an epitome for peaceful coexistence and Ferghana as the major threat to stability in the region.

Many observers have claimed that with the independence of the Central Asian states after the break-up of the Soviet Union the whole region would be ripe for ethnic rivalries. Apart from the riots in the Ferghana Valley during the late Soviet period and the Civil War in Tajikistan in the early 1990s, however, Central Asia in general and Uzbekistan in particular remained largely spared from major open conflicts. Potential for tension certainly exists and needs to be investigated but so far, conflict prevention mechanisms within these societies have earned too little attention.

 

© Meltem Sancak 2002

The oasis of Bukhara is a paradigmatic case for this. It is a place famous for the close and intimate interaction between Uzbeks and Tajiks, or Turkic and Iranian speakers, with the latter forming the majority of the population. This ‘melting pot’ situation is not a recent one but has existed for almost 1,000 years. Both groups exhibit a common culture, the same type of economic organization, and share the same economic niche in present-day Uzbekistan. A common expression in the region for this is of ‘one people with two languages’. In fact, the only recognizable difference is linguistic, the Uzbeks speaking a Turkic and the Tajiks an Indo-European language. Although it is possible to find ‘pure’ Tajik or Uzbek villages, most of them have a mixed population. Bilingualism, a result of sharing the same setting and the high proportion of mixed marriages, is a widespread phenomenon.

By contrast, the Ferghana Valley is considered the part of Central Asia with the highest potential for social and ethnic conflict. High population density, complex borders and strength of the Muslim belief are thought to be the reason for this. Without doubt, a high potential for conflict exists due to increasing poverty and social stratification. So far, however, peaceful coexistence has prevailed also in this region. Internal divisions, especially among the Uzbeks, are often more important in terms of social networks and inter-marriage than presumed ethnic boundaries. Of increasing importance, however, are state boundaries created arbitrarily during the Stalin period cutting through many people’s networks and kin groups. Visiting one’s in-laws is becoming more and more difficult. Social borders are also more pronounced in this region in comparison to Bukhara.

Meltem Sancak, Dr. des., Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin/Externe Dozentin

Abteilung Integration und Konflikt, Max-Planck Institut für ethnologische Forschung/ Ethnologisches Seminar, Universität Zürich

 

Photo 1: Osh, the Uzbek national dish, is prepared during private and public ceremonies. Every region within Uzbekistan is proud of its particular way of preparing osh. © Meltem Sancak 2001
Photo 2: Well-off households are expected to donate a sheep during the Islamic qurban ayt. The meat will be distributed among the villagers. © Meltem Sancak 2001
Photo 3: The current economic policy of Uzbekistan does not encourage entrepreneurship. Small-scale businesses like this mill are rare in the rural areas. © Meltem Sancak 2001